您的瀏覽器不支援JavaScript語法,但是並不影響您獲取本網站的內容。
:::
:::
Font size Small Medium Large | Share to:

Founding Proposal

Founding Proposal

Introduction

The proposed establishment of the Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica (IIAS) can find its root back to the initial Organization Act of the Academia Sinica of 1928 which provided that the academy shall establish, among others, the Institute of Law. However, with the changing times, the establishment of the institute of law was postponed indefinitely. Since 1999 the President of the Academia Sinica, Dr. Y. T. Lee, had appointed two preparatory committees, chaired respectively by the Grand Justice of the fifth term Herbert Han-Pao Ma and the Grand Justice of the sixth term Tze-Chien Wang, to chart a feasible course to the establishment of the law institute.

Four overarching guidelines for the new institute were finally advanced by the second committee led by Grand Justice Wang:

  1. The new institute shall strive to breakthrough the bottleneck of local legal studies with innovative spirits.
  2. With currently available research resources, the new institute shall center on core research areas and make use of its competitive edge to excel in the field.
  3. The new institute shall be flexible in its organizing structure to promote better academic cooperation and competition.
  4. The new institute shall adopt phased developing plans and maintain adaptable to changing societal needs.

Raison Detre

Raison Detre

Given that the methods and research concerns of legal study are distinct from those of humanities and social sciences, law has in recent years been gradually recognized in Taiwan as an independent discipline.

Its distinctiveness gave rise to a movement in Taiwan’s universities to separate law schools from the generic social sciences schools as well as a trend away from the archaic juxtaposition of law and commerce schools. Similarly, many countries with national academies encompass law institutes in the nation’s most reputable academic organization. For example, the Max Planck Society of Germany has seven law research institutes; People’s Republic of China’s Chinese Academy of Social Science comprises, among others, one Institute of Law. As the nation’s highest academic organization charged with the mission to play a leading role in promoting basic research and furthering knowledge, the Academia Sinica is in pressing need of establishing its own law institute. The most conspicuous reasons among all for such an initiative are as follows:

1.To Break through the Bottleneck of the Current Legal Studies in Taiwan

The rapid expansion in recent years of higher education in Taiwan has occasioned the upsurge of nearly 40 law schools and graduate programs in universities with approximately 350 law faculty and around 2,000 law degrees awarded each year. Despite the sizeable scale of legal education, the foundation for further legal development is nevertheless still shaky (note that modernization of the legal system of this country began only in 1928). One reason for such underdevelopment may be attributable to the fact that the nation had been in prolonged chaos and instability caused by either wars or the threats of war. The bar-exam-oriented legal education further aggravates the situation. To date, both the depth and breadth of domestic legal studies are inadequate and are in compelling need of improvement.

It is conceivable that state examinations are overemphasized at the expense of some others. A patent example is that legal studies are greatly divorced from real society needs, especially those that demand regulation of the industries of emerging sciences and technologies. On the one hand, related laws are unable to timely reflect the reality of a changing society and to guide or regulate effectively the social life. On the other hand, the shortage of devoted legal scholars due largely to an unreasonably low bar pass rate has in return compromised the formation and the efficacy of legal norms.

The exam-oriented legal education gravely constrains the breadth and depth of local legal studies. Current legal studies in Taiwan are limited mostly to interpreting doctrines of law or at most borrowing directly the rhetoric and language of a foreign legal scheme to serve the purpose of interpreting domestic laws. Although the approach of comparative law studies is proclaimed to be extensively used, it is more the case of a credulous apostle who transplants, copies, or simply introduces the forms of laws of other countries. Such crude comparative law studies fall short of a thorough understanding of the contexts in which legal systems of other countries are embedded. Without objective analysis of the pros and cons of comparative legal systems, no comprehensive solution that takes into account Taiwan’s actual needs and contexts can be achieved. Moreover, studies of the interpretation of doctrinal laws conducted by local legal scholars center mostly on the subjects of “general principles” of laws, such as the general principles of administrative law. They go short of delving into any specific branch of law, such as environmental law, energy law, bio-law, or informational law, where the doctrines dictated by the general principles may need to be contextually modified and attuned. As a result, theoretical research mismatches real needs and research resources are disproportionately allocated among stem and branches of laws.

Focusing exclusively on the concepts and logics of positive laws, studies of interpretation of legal doctrines pay no special attention to the analysis of the effects of those laws on the society and their consequences—for example systematic investigation of court rulings and the empirical diagnosis of the performance and functioning of positive laws—and not to mention the analysis of the ways that laws are made (such as legislative behaviors). Without empirical studies on experience of local legal practices, and without an appreciation of the importance of the organic connection and dialectic relation between law and society, no law that effectively governs the society can be formulated. Unfortunately, the function of interdisciplinary approach remains to be the mere piling up of discrete studies on loosely defined topics conducted jointly by scholars of different disciplines.

In addition to the inadequacy of the breadth and depth of legal studies, the scale of interaction between local and international academic communities, especially long-term international cooperation, also needs to be expanded. Although the absence of regular international interaction may be the result of Taiwan’s protracted isolation from the international community, it also attests to the fact that Taiwan is in need of a strong boost for the quality of its legal studies. IIAS will take effective measures to encourage fellow researchers to actively participate in international academic activities, to publish at internationally recognized academic journals, and promote international academic exchange.

2. To Play a Leading Role in Setting up a Paradigm for Local Legal Studies

The emergence of jurisprudence can be dated back to ancient Roman times. Thanks to the great Codex Justinianeus, the collection of all of the extant imperial constitutions from the time of Hadrian spurred a trend toward studies of the Corpus Iuris Civilis that placed jurisprudence along with medicine and theology as one of the three major studies of ancient times. The oldest university in the Western world, founded in Bologna, Italy, in 1088, was the principal center for studies in canon and civil law in the 12th-13th centuries. Jurisprudence has had a long history and has played a crucial role in the development of civilization. Primarily influenced by scholasticism, ancient legal studies that enshrined and closely adhered to the Roman laws were conducted by an approach similar to that of Bible annotation. The persistent effect of legal scholasticism resulted in self-contained interpretation studies of positive laws that focused primarily on the dogmatic logic of legal texts. Not until the mid-19th century was the academic value of scholastic jurisprudence harshly questioned in a much-publicized article by the Prussian jurist Julius Hermann von Kirchmann: “three correcting words of the legislator make whole libraries become rubbish (drei berichtigende Wörte des Gesetzgebers und ganze Bibliotheken werden zur Makulatur).” The austere criticism stunned the European legal academic world and prompted deep yet constructive self-examination. The traditional shackles of legal conceptualism were eventually lifted, allowing the rise of all sorts of liberal schools of modern jurisprudence, such as teleology and the interest theory. Furthermore, under the cross-influence of Anglo-American legal thought, jurisprudence has gradually come to be understood as a social phenomenon awaiting empirical study, or as a type of social engineering that needs to be scientifically designed. Legal studies developed once from the domain of humanities and now extend to the field of social sciences. This transformation paved the way for vigorous development of jurisprudence in the past century.

The founding of IIAS in the national academy not only affirms that jurisprudence is an independent, basic discipline to which we should attach high attention, but also demonstrates the resolve to make breakthroughs in domestic legal studies. Interpretation of laws should not become a mere mechanical study of dogmatic logic. Instead, to achieve a systematic hermeneutics of laws, legal interpretation should take into consideration the objective goals, balance positively the interests and the harms, and even engage the inevitable questions of value judgment. Moreover, given the pragmatic nature of law as an effective means to social control, legal studies shall also pay close attention to empirical investigation of laws and observe keenly the dialectic relation between social phenomena and law. To rejuvenate the fount of legal studies, IIAS will employ social scientific methods to guide the establishment of paradigms for domestic legal studies and to advance the systematic accumulation of legal knowledge.

3. In Response to the Demands of a Changing Society

Taiwan has in the last decade enjoyed rapid development and experienced massive transformation in various respects including that of the constitutional framework, economic order, and the social welfare system. Taiwan had earned acclaim for its democratization, but disorder and turmoil accompanied the process of transformation. While democracy and rule of law are like two wings of a bird and two wheels of a cart, forming the indispensable two sides of a system, the authority of law is yet to be fully established in this country, partly owing to lack in traditional culture of the notion of rule of law. The distortion of normal legal practice in the period of “mobilization and suppression of communist rebellion” and the martial law era certainly also contributed to the current malfunction of the rule of law. To foster more actively a mature democracy under the rule of law is the inalienable social responsibility of the Academia Sinica as the national academy. To restore law as social norm that embodies justice, IIAS shall devote itself to bolstering the society’s conviction in rule of law by deepening legal studies and constructing fair and objective deliberation on laws.

Aim

Aim

In accordance with the above mentioned raison d'être and the blueprint of the IIAS and in reference to the development of legal studies in countries with well-established rule of law, the four missions of IIAS are set as follows:

  1. Advancing, with innovative spirit and an eye on the development of the nation, basic legal studies with both breadth and depth that serve theoretical as well as pragmatic use so as to raise the quality while nourish the foundations of local legal studies.
  2. Coordinating amongst local legal scholars and those abroad to explore and cultivate research fields with competitive advantages.
  3. Playing a vital role in promoting studies of regional legal systems and regional academic cooperation in the areas of China, Hong Kong, Macau, and East Asia.
  4. Providing a trustworthy public discourse of law to foster the full-fledged rule of law in a burgeoning democracy.

Strategies

Strategies

To carry out the missions of IIAS, development strategies and the roadmap need to be properly charted. The strategies for IIAS are twofold: dividing development stages and formulating cooperation plans. The former is to set benchmarks for each development stage. The latter is to identify the relative advantage of IIAS so as to find a feasible way for cooperation as well as competition with local and international research communities.

1.Short-term goals and strategy—consolidating present advantages and accruing new potential

In the first six years after the inauguration of IIAS (preparatory office), the priority is to secure current advantages by organizing a core research team and to recruit new blood to set off research in each of the six core research areas (as detailed below). The number of full-time research fellows is expected to reach 20 by the end of the short-term development phase, with each core research area having at least one research fellow doing research in the field. The 20-researcher team forms the initial main plank of the IIAS with the capability to excel in the already successful fields of research and to rapidly develop in newly explored core research areas.

2.Mid-term goals and strategy—setting up new paradigms and expanding advantages

In the following 10-year growth period, two development goals are set. First, in addition to continually building up the research momentum of the core research team formed in the previous phase, the development strategy of IIAS shall aim at establishing intellectual paradigms in those core fields of research with competitive advantages to lead the systematization of legal studies. Second, to galvanize the research intensity in other core research areas, IIAS shall continue to expand the research team by recruiting new elite researchers in accordance with the developing needs of those core research areas. The number of the resident research fellows is expected to reach 40 by the end of the mid-term development phase, with each core research areas having enough research fellows to form at least one interactively vibrant team-based research group. Based on the prototype of the team-based research group, various cooperation and interaction platforms can be readily erected for intramural, interdisciplinary, or even inter-institution cooperation.

3.Long-term goals and strategy—emerging as a vigorous participant in the international academic community

After the mid-term development phase, IIAS will enter a stage of full-fledged research capacity supported by a well-developed structure. As the development goal for this phase, research in the core research areas will continue to flourish and will become internationally recognized. On the one hand, IIAS shall keep on recruiting new blood to maintain its research momentum and to beef up the capacity of research groups in each core research area. Such capacity will in return be of use in more extensively establishing intellectual paradigms and in deepening the systematization of legal studies. On the other hand, IIAS shall seek excellence in certain core research areas and thus come out as the nucleus of regional legal studies in East Asia. The number of resident fellow researchers will reach 45 in the long-term development phase, with each core research area having several energetic team-based research groups, which vigorously sponsor intramural, interdisciplinary or inter-institution studies and actively partake in international academic communities. As a result, IIAS will be turned into a prestigious world class law institute.

Research Fields

Research Fields

In order to make breakthroughs in a most efficient way, the available resources must first be allotted in several core research areas. The selection of such core areas of IIAS fields of research must take into account all of the following four factors to the extent possible:

  1. Those fields of research that fully subserve the functions of the Academia Sinica as a national academy and those that complement university work.
  2. Those crucial fields of research that create a solid grounding for local legal studies and that at the same time elevate the standing of legal academics.
  3. Those fields of research that address the long-term trend of national development and those that promise to generate influential legal issues.
  4. Those fields of research that afford a foremost position among the international legal scholarship in inducing academic trends and in pioneering in cutting-edge issues.

In consideration of the above four factors, six core research areas are selected as follows:

1.Constitutional Structure and Individual Rights

Constitutional structure and individual rights are the two main subjects of the studies of the fundamental law of a democracy—the constitution. Whether the exertion of state power is duly checked by objective norms and whether individual rights are fully granted and properly protected are the benchmarks of a democracy under the rule of law. Studies of constitutional law involve to a certain degree the dialogue between law and politics: the constitution reflects the political reality of a society and in return demarcates the boundary for political activities. Studies of constitutional law consist not only of the studies of constitutional norms (theory) and constitutional practice (praxis), but also of the issues of how to regulate inferior laws and how to harmonize the constitution and norms of other legal schemes. As a constantly changing society, Taiwan has in the past 10 years experienced six runs of constitutional amendment (the so-called “constitutional reforms”). Studies of constitutional law are commonly regarded as the most rapidly growing discipline in recent years.

Currently, the major interests of most law researchers of the Academia Sinica center on public laws (constitution and administrative law). Their work has yielded noticeable results. For example, the now defunct Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy, Academia Sinica, one of the organizational precursor of IIAS, has since 1997 held four pioneering series of widely proclaimed academic symposia—“Constitutional Interpretation in Theory and Practice.” The articles presented in the symposia have, after rigorous peer-review, been published in a book series frequently cited by constitutional court justices and legal academics.

Constitutional structure and individual rights have a crucial effect on the very foundation of a nation’s long-term development. As a national academy, the Academia Sinica shall engage itself more actively in providing rhetoric and shaping discourse on constitutional reform issues of material importance. With relatively small manpower (compared to law schools in universities), the Academia Sinica has been able to gain considerable competitive edge, including outstanding research and plentiful library collections after years of hardworking endeavors. It is natural that the study of constitutional law be selected as a core research field that deserves continuing investment.

2.Administrative Regulation and Judicial Remedies

Modern administrative states impose an array of regulatory schemes on private economic and social activities. More often than not, economic and social regulation is implemented by enforcing regulatory standards formulated and prescribed by administrative agencies whose authority to stipulate is formally delegated by legislature. Administrative redress procedure, including administrative appeals review and administrative litigation, on the other hand provides mechanisms for dispute resolution. Studies of contemporary administrative law focus mainly on the formation, implementation, and dispute resolution of administrative regulation in a wide range of social and economic life. With the rapid pace of economic growth and social development, economic regulation (such as Fair Trade Law, Securities and Exchange Law, Futures Trading Law, and Telecommunication Law) and social regulation (such as various labor laws and environmental laws) have sprung up in Taiwan. Given the changing nature and the novelty of the subject matters of administrative regulation that bewilder most of professional lawyers, participation of lawyers in the making of regulatory policy has been scant and limited. As a result, loopholes and inconsistency often occur. Moreover, when encountering regulatory disputes involving unfamiliar economic or social activities, judges usually lack the necessary background understanding to carry out effective legality control. How to improve the rationality and effectiveness of various regulatory schemes and to make the most of law as a means of social control are imminent issues that challenge the study of administrative law in a rapidly changing society.

The law section of the Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy (ISSP), had held two symposia on “Law and Economics Analysis,” a series of conferences seeking to study principles of certain areas of law, such as torts and property, from an economics perspective. The symposia on “Regulatory Reform,” aimed to examine the problems of regulatory schemes imposed on varied industries (such as the telecommunications industry and power industry), was also held during the same era. A successful first step has been made even though the work of systematic research is still confined by the extremely limited research manpower and the demanding nature of interdisciplinary studies (dialogue between public and private law, between law and economics). While the research capacity to respond to newly emerging issues is still limited, social change and international interaction continue and will only become more rapid and frequent in the future. However, considering the wide-ranging scope of studies of administrative law, IIAS will primarily take up areas that universities are not in a position to adequately address or accommodate. Therefore, to engage in in-depth research that complements university work, IIAS will employ innovative approaches to study only selected areas of administrative regulation.

3.Law, Science and Technology

The Academia Sinica currently comprises 26 research institutes (preparatory offices and research centers included). Among them, 18 institutes are in the fields of natural or life sciences. Their research has after years of hard work yielded cutting-edge knowledge and technologic breakthroughs. Scientific research undoubtedly remain central to the future development of the Academia Sinica. However, with the rapid pace of scientific research and the development of technology industries, society is in pressing needs of laws that provide clear rules to follow, such as whether cloning technologies should be allowed and to what extent and whether the issuance of national identity cards containing biometric information is compatible with the demand for privacy.

Those laws that come into being owing to the advent of new technologies can roughly be classified under the umbrella of “tech-laws,” but clearly belong to a variety of fields: some belong to environmental laws and laws that protect intellectual property rights, the study of which has attained preliminary results in Taiwan; some are information laws (law and informational technology) and gene laws (law and genetics), development of which is still in their infancy. Studies of “tech-laws” are of forward-looking nature, which fits quite nicely into the nation’s long-term development plan. Moreover, studies of “tech-laws” have also become a promising platform for international academic exchange. For all those reasons, “tech-laws” should be a field of research worth the investment of a national academy.
 
The major research fields of the current IIAS research fellows include, among others, environmental laws (including international environmental laws), intellectual property rights laws, and bio-laws. The short-term strategy for this core research area is to partake in intramural and extramural scientific research projects to reclaim long-ignored legal perspectives. The mid-term strategy is to cooperate with intramural scientific research centers or those of other universities to more actively steer and shape the issues in “tech-laws.” The ultimate goal is to rise as an autonomous discipline that specializes in interdisciplinary research.

4.Jurisprudence and Social Change

Studies of legal thoughts and social transformation are commonly dubbed “basic legal studies,” which cover diverse branches of studies, such as legal philosophy, legal research methods, legal history, and legal sociology. Taiwan’s current legal system is primarily the product of a large-scale system transplantation, beginning from political reforms undertaken at the end of the Ch’ing Dynasty, from major western countries. While the system transplantation brought with it the concept of “rule of law,” which is entirely foreign to the traditional Chinese culture, the pragmatic-oriented political reforms dispensed with the serious inquest into the seemingly abstruse origins of the legal thought. The dearth of interests in the studies of legal thought is further aggravated by the exam-oriented legal education. All these factors contribute to make the “basic legal studies” the weakest link in domestic legal studies.

IIAS has currently no research fellow specializing in the studies of legal thought and social transformation. Only some researchers at the Institute of History and Philosophy engage in the study of “Chinese legal history.” “Basic legal studies” are indeed indispensable if rule of law is to take root in this country and if the insight of legal studies is to be deepened. As a national academy, the Academia Sinica shall pay great attention to such a field of research. Also, since the studies of legal thought and social transformation do not usually provide immediate gains or quick success for researchers, it needs a relatively stable research environment that may not be available at universities. Nevertheless, if studies of legal thought and social transformation are to exert influence on the establishment of legal literacy and to provide real insights into intricate issues, they need to engage with and address the actualities of social life, and seek out dialogue with empirical studies and other disciplines.

5.Legal Development in China, Hong Kong, and Macau

Ever since the economic reform and the policy of opening to the outside world initiated in 1978, People’s Republic of China (PRC) has made efforts to construct a distinct legal system with the intellectual aid of transplantation of legal systems from other countries. Despite its insistence on the domination of the communist party in the political domain, China has been open to market economy and adopted capitalism at least partially. Even though such a peculiar combination has given rise to incongruity and instability in China’s legal system, its pace of legislation has been astonishingly fast. The policy of “rule the country by law” was proposed in the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in 1998. Under the banner of “building a socialist state under the rule of law,” Article 5 of PRC’s constitution was amended accordingly in 1999. Furthermore, the demand for keeping its domestic legal system up with the standards of the international community has intensified and the pace of legal development accelerated after China joined the World Trade Organization. More and more attention is now being paid to Chinese legal studies in many parts of the world. Chinese legal studies are of practical use to Taiwan because a substantial number of Taiwanese entrepreneurs with investment in China face myriad legal disputes in their daily operation. This practical reason for engaging in Chinese legal studies is accompanied by the expediency of a commonly shared language. However, the current Chinese legal studies in Taiwan remain in a state of static analysis and interpretation or a mere comparison of related laws. To address more and more legal issues arising out of frequent interactions across the Taiwan Strait, both the scope and depth of Chinese legal studies need to be increased. Also, as former British and Portuguese colonies, Hong Kong and Macau inherited much of the legal tradition of their respective colonist home countries. Studies of the concomitant issues of how to connect rails between the track of the colonial systems and that of the Chinese legal system and also of how to reconcile common law and civil law systems may also be of use to secure Taiwan’s interests in those regions.

Studies of the legal development of the four regions across the Taiwan Strait-- China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are characteristic of regional legal study. IIAS shall, in conducting research in the four above-mentioned core research areas, always try to incorporate the accounts of legal development in China, Hong Kong, and Macau. IIAS will endeavor to ultimately develop into a powerhouse of regional legal study through constant exchange of information and experience with scholars within the region.

6. Judiciary System, Judicial Behavior, and Legislative Studies

A judiciary system, which normally comprises several levels of trial and appellate courts, is a requisite element in every political system that honors the rule of law. Courts hear and adjudicate cases or controversies, through which process court proceedings and rulings manifest the most typical judicial behaviors. Studies of the judiciary system and judicial behaviors produce in-depth observation of the operation of judiciary power, which serves as background survey research for future judicial reform. Given that the judicial behaviors are highly dependent upon the cultural tradition and social structure of different societies, empirical studies of the judiciary system and judicial behaviors in Taiwan also provide rich soil for comparative law studies that constitute an excellent sphere for academic exchange between local and international legal scholarship. To date, there has been a veritable paucity of domestic empirical legal studies or surveys. IIAS shall explore and cultivate this long dormant area in close cooperation with intramural research teams at the Institute of Sociology, the Institute of Political Science, and the Center for Survey Research. Empirical studies require long-term research endeavor and merit interdisciplinary cooperation that characterizes the approach of synthetic studies specifically employed by IIAS.

Local legal studies more often than not emphasize dogmatic interpretation of laws at the expense of the consideration of other dimensions of law, for example the field of legislative studies. Many difficulties and impasse arising from the application of law are indeed the results of unsophisticated and cursory legislation. It therefore is urgent to find ways to improve legislation techniques (for example, to precisely define legal terminology used, to ascertain legislative principles and to require legislative findings before drafting the laws, as well as to employ the model of packaging legislation or omnibus legislation) and to enhance the function of policy research. Few or no scholars currently offer courses on legislative studies in universities, whereas lawmakers are in need of systematic knowledge of legislative techniques. IIAS shall, on its own or in cooperation with other intramural institutes or centers, fill in this gap.

Feature

picture 1

By employing the approach of “synthetic studies” in the six core research areas, IIAS will be able to create a new climate and to elevate the standing of domestic legal studies. More specifically, the approach of the “synthetic studies” will be shown mainly in the following aspects:

1.Combination of Localized Problematics with Comparative Law Studies

While inhering in the selection of the six core areas is the localized problematics, comparative law studies can nonetheless provide common lessons from other countries on similar issues. The future research agenda of IIAS will continue to display the feature of the “synthesis studies” that combine both local and international elements.

2.Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies

IIAS will pay special attention to in-depth theoretical studies when conducting future research in the core research areas. For example,IIAS research will seek to give a full rather than incomplete account of foreign legal systems when the approach of comparative law studies is used. On the other hand, IIAS will also engage in empirical studies, such as the investigation and analysis of the effects of a law, in order to form a “synthesis study” with both normative and descriptive elements in combination

3.Equal Emphasis on Leading Edge Issues and More Basic Legal Studies

IIAS will not only emphasize the studies for short-term leading edge issues, such as the research on “tech-laws,” to satisfy the development needs of the society. IIAS will also invest on long-term basic research, such as the research on legal thoughts, to cultivate and nourish the intellectual roots of local legal studies.

4.Promotion of Team-based Research Along with Individual-based Research

As an institution of Academia Sinica, whose mission is to lead the academic development of the country, IIAS will promote team-based research. IIAS will beginning from the mid-term development phase use the research groups in each core research areas as hinges to establish research standards for legal studies, such as systemization of legal research methodology, creation of a uniform system of legal citation, setting standards for research evaluation and accreditation, and the work of annotating current laws.

5. Interdisciplinary Approach

IIAS will promote interdisciplinary synthesis of law and other social sciences and of law and natural sciences when conducting research in the core research areas. The use of the interdisciplinary approach is meant to overcome the limitations of individual disciplines in perspective, theory and methodology. After years of interdisciplinary practice in the Academia Sinica, legal researchers in the academy are now more familiar with cooperation with other social science disciplines. IIAS will continue to tread the path and to cooperate more actively with intramural technology research centers and/or scientific research institutes. IIAS will recruit legal researchers with various technology backgrounds to highlight the feature of interdisciplinary “synthesis studies.”

TOP